<< Предыдущая стр. 17(из 100 стр.)ОГЛАВЛЕНИЕ Следующая >>

Gordon n+1в†’в€ћ

Equals

в€ћ
1 n n+1

Table 3-1: Proof of ADF Equations (3-6) through (3-6b)
Table 3-1 is the valuation of a 10-year annuity, with a discount rate of
15% and an annual growth rate of 5.1%. All assumptions appear in cells

4. The п¬Ѓrst yearвЂ™s cash п¬‚ow is 1, or (1 + g)0. The second yearвЂ™s cash п¬‚ow is (1 + g)1. In general,
cash п¬‚ow in Year t (1 + g)t 1.

CHAPTER 3 Annuity Discount Factors and the Gordon Model 65
T A B L E 3-1

A B C D E F

g)t 1
4 t (Yrs) Cash Flow (CF) Growth in CF (1 PV Factor NPV
5 1 1.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.86957 0.86957
6 2 1.05100 0.05100 1.05100 0.75614 0.79471
7 3 1.10460 0.05360 1.10460 0.65752 0.72629
8 4 1.16094 0.05633 1.16094 0.57175 0.66377
9 5 1.22014 0.05921 1.22014 0.49718 0.60663
10 6 1.28237 0.06223 1.28237 0.43233 0.55440
11 7 1.34777 0.06540 1.34777 0.37594 0.50668
12 8 1.41651 0.06874 1.41651 0.32690 0.46306
13 9 1.48875 0.07224 1.48875 0.28426 0.42320
14 10 1.56468 0.07593 1.56468 0.24718 0.38676
15 Totals 5.99506
17 Calculation of NPV by formulas:
18 Grand
19 Time 1 to Inп¬Ѓnity (n 1) to Inп¬Ѓnity 1 to n Total
20 NPV 10.10101 4.10595 5.99506 5.99506
22 Assumptions:
24 n Number of years of cash п¬‚ows 10
24 r Discount rate 15.0%
26 g Growth rate in net inc/cash п¬‚ow 5.1%
27 x (1 g)/(1 r) 0.9139
28 Gordon model multiple GM 1/(r g) 10.101010

32 B20: GM 1/(r g)
33 C20: GM*x n
34 D20 B20 C20
35 E20 GM * (1 x n) This is equation (3-6c)

0.9139 (F27).5 If
F24 to F28. Recall that we deп¬Ѓne x (1 g)/(1 r)
this were a perpetuity, the Gordon model multiple would be 10.101010
(F28).
We begin with a cash п¬‚ow of \$1.00 at the end of Year 1 (B5). Column
C shows the annual growth in cash п¬‚ows at 5.1%.6 The cash п¬‚ow in
Column B is always equal to the previous cash п¬‚ow plus the growth in
the current period, where Cash Flowt Cash Flowt 1 Growtht. Column
D replicates the cash п¬‚ow in Column C using the formula Cash Flow
(1 g)t 1, which thus provides us with a general formula for the cash
п¬‚ows. We multiply the cash п¬‚ows in Column C by the end-of-year present
value factor in Column E to arrive at the present value of the cash п¬‚ows

5. As mentioned in a previous footnote, we use i synonymously with r.
6. We can use the same formulas for other time periods, e.g., months instead of years. Then we
must use the monthly growth rate of 5.1%/12 0.4267% instead of the annual.

PART 1 Forecasting Cash Flows
66
in Column F. The sum of the present values of the 10 years of cash п¬‚ows
is 5.99506 in F15. This is the вЂ˜вЂ˜brute forceвЂ™вЂ™ method of calculating the an-
nuity.
As we will demonstrate, equation (3-6) is a more compact and ele-
gant solution. Cell B20 contains the end-of-year Gordon multiple results
of the п¬Ѓrst term in equation (3-6), which equals F28. This is the present
value of the perpetuity of \$1.00 growing at a constant 5.1% from Year 1
to inп¬Ѓnity. In C20 we subtract the present value of the perpetuity from
Year n 1 to inп¬Ѓnity, which equals 4.10595 and is the term in equation
(3-6) in square brackets. The difference of the two perpetuities is 5.99506,
which equals F15, our brute force solution. Finally, E20 is the formula for
the entire equation, which equals the same 5.99506 calculated in D20 and
F15, proving the validity of equation (3-6), including its components. We
show the formulas for Row 20 at the bottom of Table 3-1. Note that the
formula in E20 is equation (3-6c).

A Brief Summary
To help you decide if you should read on, letвЂ™s take a look at what we
have covered so far, what we will cover in the remainder of the chapter,
and how difп¬Ѓcult the material will be. We have thus far derived the end-
of-year ADF, examined its special cases (the Gordon model and the no-
growth formula), explained the intimate relationship of the ADF and the
Gordon model, explained the intuition behind the components of the
ADF model, and proved the model with an example.
The reader now should understand the principles of ADFs and Gor-
don models. If you are having difп¬Ѓculty with the mathematics, you may
wish to skip to the sections on Periodic Perpetuity Factors (PPFs) and
Relationship of the Gordon Model to the Price/Earnings Ratio, which are
of practical signiп¬Ѓcance to most readers. However, you now should un-
derstand almost everything you will need to easily comprehend the rest
of the chapter. The rest of the chapter is primarily simple variations of
the derivations we have done thus far.
In the remainder of the chapter, we will cover:
в—Џ The midyear version of the ADF (with the same special cases of
the Gordon model and g 0).
в—Џ Starting periods for the cash п¬‚ows that are different than Year 1,
which is of practical signiп¬Ѓcance in discounted cash п¬‚ow analysis
in the calculation of the PV of the reversion.
в—Џ Calculating periodic perpetuity factors (PPFs), which are a
variation of the Gordon model for periodic expenses such as
moving expense and losses from lawsuits. Additionally, PPFs are
useful for decisions in buying new versus used income-
producing equipment (such as CAT scans, ships, or taxicabs) and
for calculating the value of used equipment.
в—Џ Calculating loan payments.
в—Џ Calculating the present value of loans.

CHAPTER 3 Annuity Discount Factors and the Gordon Model 67
в—Џ The relationship of the Gordon model to the PE multiple, the
misunderstanding of which may well be the single most
common source of technical error in business valuation.

MIDYEAR CASH FLOWS
Most businesses have cash п¬‚ows that more or less occur evenly through-
out the year. In a present value sense, this is approximately equivalent to
having all cash п¬‚ows occur midway through the year. Thus, in valuing
most businesses, it is appropriate to use midyear cash п¬‚ows rather than
end-of-year cash п¬‚ows.
Midyear cash п¬‚ows occur six months (one half-year) earlier than end-
of-year cash п¬‚ows. We derive this formula in exactly the same fashion as
equation (3-6). We start with equation (3-1b); however, the denominators,
which are the time periods by which we discount the cash п¬‚ows, are one
half-year less than those in equation (3-1b). We adjust for this difference
by multiplying every numerator by 1 r, which has the same effect
as reducing the denominators by 0.5 years. We then factor the 1 r
out of the sequence, resulting in a the midyear ADF that equals 1 r
times the end-of-year ADF.
n
1 r 1 r
1 g
r g 1 r r g

We interpret equation (3-10) in exactly the same fashion as equation
(3-6). We can factor out the Gordon model multiple as before and restate
equation (3-10) as equations (3-10a) and (3-10b) below. Note that equa-
tions (3-10a) and (3-10b) are identical to equations (3-6b) and (3-6c), re-
spectively, except that the Gordon model multiple is midyear instead of
end-of-year.
n
1 r 1 g
ADF 1 alternative expression for (3-10)
r g 1 r
(3-10a)
n
ADF GM (1 x ) second alternative expression for (3-10) (3-10b)

Table 3-2: Example of Equation (3-10) through (3-10b)
Table 3-2 is identical to Table 3-1, except that here we use the midyear
rather than end-of-year ADF. Note that the Gordon model multiple (GM)
in B20 and F28 is 10.83213 versus 10.101010 in Table 3-1. The GM in Table
3-2 is exactly 1 r times the GM in Table 3-1, i.e., 10.1010 1.15
10.83213. This demonstrates the validity of equations (3-10) through
(3-10b), the midyear ADF.

Special Cases for Midyear Cash Flows: No Growth, g 0
Letting g 0 in the equation above, we obtain the following ADF for
midyear cash п¬‚ows with no growth:

PART 1 Forecasting Cash Flows
68
T A B L E 3-2

A B C D E F

g)t 1
4 t (Yrs) Cash Flow (CF) Growth in CF (1 PV Factor NPV
5 1 1.00000 0.00000 1.00000 0.93250 0.93250
6 2 1.05100 0.05100 1.05100 0.81087 0.85223
7 3 1.10460 0.05360 1.10460 0.70511 0.77886
8 4 1.16094 0.05633 1.16094 0.61314 0.71181
9 5 1.22014 0.05921 1.22014 0.53316 0.65053
10 6 1.28237 0.06223 1.28237 0.46362 0.59453
11 7 1.34777 0.06540 1.34777 0.40315 0.54335
12 8 1.41651 0.06874 1.41651 0.35056 0.49658
13 9 1.48875 0.07224 1.48875 0.30484 0.45383
14 10 1.56468 0.07593 1.56468 0.26508 0.41476
15 Totals 6.42899
17 Calculation of NPV by formulas:
18 Grand
19 Time 1 to Inп¬Ѓnity (n 1) to Inп¬Ѓnity 1 to n Total
20 NPV 10.83213 4.40314 6.42899 6.42899
22 Assumptions:
24 n Number of years of cash п¬‚ows 10
25 r Discount rate 15.0%
26 g Growth rate in net inc/cash п¬‚ow 5.1%
27 x (1 g)/(1 r) 0.9139
28 Gordon model multiple GM SQRT(1 r)/(r g) 10.83213

32 B20: GM SQRT(1 r)/(r G)
33 C20: GM*x n
34 D20 B20 C20
35 E20 GM * (1 x n) This is equation (3-10b)

1 r 1 r
1
r)n
r (1 r
This follows the same type of logic as equation (3-6), with modiп¬Ѓ-
cation for growth being zero. The п¬Ѓrst and third terms on the RHS of
equation (3-10c) are midyear Gordon models for a constant \$1 cash п¬‚ow.
g)n
Since there is no growth of cash п¬‚ows in this special case, the (1
in equation (3-10) simpliп¬Ѓes to 1 and drops out of the equation. The
r)n discounts the second Gordon model term from t
1/(1 n back to
t 0, i.e., it reduces the PV of the perpetuity to time zero. Again, the
ADF is the difference of two perpetuities: the п¬Ѓrst one with cash п¬‚ows
from 1 to inп¬Ѓnity, less the second one with cash п¬‚ows from n 1 to
inп¬Ѓnity, the difference being cash п¬‚ows from 1 to n.
We can rewrite equation (3-10c) as equation (3-10d) by factoring out
the 1 r/r.
1 r 1
ADF 1 alternate expression for (3-10c),
r)n
r (1
midyear, no growth (3-10d)

CHAPTER 3 Annuity Discount Factors and the Gordon Model 69
Gordon Model
Letting n в†’ in equation (3-10) leads us to the Gordon model.
1 r
PV CF Gordon modelвЂ”midyear (3-10e)
(r g)
 << Предыдущая стр. 17(из 100 стр.)ОГЛАВЛЕНИЕ Следующая >>