<<

. 58
( 61 .)



>>

ing the Law of Weapons Control “ Comparative Approaches to Strengthen Nuclear
Non-Proliferation, 16 Mich. J. Int™l L. 1029 (1995).
Kellman, Barry, Applicability of Chemical Weapons Convention Verification Provi-
sions for Strengthening the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime, Draft Report for
the DOE International Safeguards Division (October 1994).
Kellman, Barry, Ballistic Missile Defense in the Context of Multilateral, Multi-
Faceted Security, 4 Nexus J. Op. 73 (1999).
Kellman, Barry, Bridling the International Trade of Catastrophic Weaponry, 43 Am.
U. L. Rev. 3 (Spring 1994).
Kellman, Barry, International Consensus and States Non-Parties, in Future Legal
Restraints on Arms Proliferation: Arms Control & Disarmament Law, United
Nations (Julie Dahlitz, ed., 1996).
Kellman, Barry, Manual for National Implementation of the Chemical Weapons
Convention (2nd edition, February 1998, published in English and Arabic) (1st
edition, December 1993).
Kellman, Barry, National Missile Defense and the ABM Treaty: Considerations of
International Security and Law 5 J. Con¬‚ict & Security Law 281 (2000).
Kellman, Barry, State Responsibility for Preventing Bioterrorism, International
Lawyer (2002).
Kellman, Barry, The Advent of International Chemical Regulation “ The Chemical
Weapons Convention Implementation Act, 25 J. Leg.117 (1999).
341
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Kellman, Barry, The Draft Model Convention on the Prohibition and Prevention of
Biological Terrorism, 14 Terrorism and Political Violence (2002).
Kellman, Barry, The Role of Nuclear Weapons in Deterring Chemical/Biological
Weapons Attacks: National and Non-national Threats, 31 Case W. Res. J. Int™l
L. 619 (1999).
Kellman, Barry, WMD Proliferation “ An International Crime?, Nonproliferation
Review (Spring 2001).
Kelly, David C., The Trilateral Agreement: Lessons for Biological Weapons Verifica-
tion, Veri¬cation Yearbook 2002 (2002).
Koblentz, Gregory, Pathogens as Weapons; The International Security Implications
of Biological Warfare, International Security (Winter 2004).
Kohler, Michael, & Wolfgang Fritzsche, Nanotechnology: An Introduction to
Nanostructuring Techniques, Wiley VCH (2004).
Koplow, David, Nonlethal Weapons: The Law and Policy of Revolutionary Tech-
nologies for the Military and Law Enforcement, Cambridge University Press
(2006).
Koplow, David, Tangled up in Khaki and Blue: Lethal and Non-Lethal Weapons in
Recent Confrontations, 36 Geo. J. Int™l L. 703 (Spring 2005).
Laws and Regulations Governing the Protection of Sensitive but Unclassified Infor-
mation, A Report prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress
under an Interagency Agreement with the NASA Of¬ce of Inspector General
(September 2004).
Leitenberg, Milton, Biological Weapons in the Twentieth Century: A Review and
Analysis, Report prepared for the 7th International Symposium on Protection
against Chemical and Biological Warfare, Critical Reviews in Microbiology
(2001).
Leitenberg, Milton, Distinguishing Offensive from Defensive Biological Weapons
Research, Critical Reviews in Methodology, Vol. 29, No. 3 (2003).
Littlewood, Jez, The Biological Weapons Convention: A Failed Revolution, Ash-
gate (2005).
Luongo, Kenneth N., et al., Building a Forward Line of Defense Securing Former
Soviet Biological Weapons, Arms Control Today (July/August 2004).
Media Brie¬ng with Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge; Secretary of Health
and Human Services Tommy Thomson; and Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul
Wolfowitz, Biodefense for the 21st Century, Location: Auditorium, Health and
Human Services (April 28, 2004).
Melson, Ashley R., Bioterrorism, Biodefense, and Biotechnology in the Military: A
Comparative Analysis of Legal and Ethical Issues in the Research, Development,
and Use of Biotechnological Products on American and British Soldiers, 14 Alb.
L.J. Sci. & Tech. 497 (2004).
Memorandum: Preliminary Legal Review of Proposed Chemical-Based Nonlethal
Weapons, Naval Security Law Branch, Department of the Navy, Of¬ce of the Judge
Advocate General, International and Operational Law Division (November 30,
1997).
342 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Meselson, Matthew, & Julian Robinson, A Draft Convention to Prohibit Biological
and Chemical Weapons Under International Criminal Law, Fletcher F. World
Aff. 28 (Winter 2004).
Miller, Judith, Stephen Engelberg, & William J. Broad, U.S. Germ Warfare Research
Pushes Treaty Limits, New York Times (September 4, 2001).
Miller, Judith, New Biolabs Stir a Debate Over Secrecy and Safety, New York Times
(February 20, 2004).
Monath, Thomas, & Lance Gordon, Strengthening the Biological Weapons Conven-
tion, Science, Vol. 282 (November 20, 1998).
Moodie, Michael, Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Proliferation Dilemma:
Confronting the Biological and Chemical Weapons Challenge: The Need
for an “Intellectual Infrastructure,” 28 Fletcher F. World Aff. 43 (Winter
2004).
Non-Lethal Weapons Research in the U.S.: Genetically Engineered Anti-Material
Weapons, The Sunshine Project, Backgrounder Series, Number 9 (March
2002).
Olson, Inga, Nuclear Labs Move into the “Biodefense” Business; Biodevastation 7,
Synthesis Regeneration, No. 34 (March 22, 2004).
Ostrander, Jeremy, Between Empire and Community: The United States and Multi-
lateralism 2001“2003, 21 Berkeley J. Int™l L. 495 (2003).
Panofsky, Wolfgang K. H., Dismantling the Concept of “Weapons of Mass Destruc-
tion,” Arms Control Today (April 1998).
Parachini, John V., et al., Diversion of Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical
Weapons Expertise from the Former Soviet Union “ Understanding an Evolv-
ing Problem, RAND Corporation (2005).
Paris, Kristen, The Expansion of the Biological Weapons Convention: The His-
tory and Problems of a Verification Regime, 24 Hous. J. Int™l L. 509 (Spring
2002).
Pearson, Graham S., Scientific and Technical Implications of the Implementation of
the BTWC Protocol, Report of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop Warsaw,
Poland (November 2“4, 2000).
Pearson, Graham S., The Protocol to Strengthen the BTWC: An Integrated Regime,
Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 2 (1998).
Pearson, Graham, The Biological Weapons Convention Sixth Review Conference,
The CBS Conventions Bulletin, Issue 74 (December 2006).
Pettitt, Leah, Weapons of Mass Destruction Stockpiled in Russia: Should the United
States Continue to Implement Programs Designed to Reduce and Safeguard These
Weapons? 16 Transnat™l Law 169 (Fall 2002).
Pinson, Robert D., Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical
Weapons Conventions?, 22 Berkeley J. Int™l L. 279 (2004).
Posteraro, Christopher Clarke, Intervention in Iraq: Towards a Doctrine of Antici-
patory Counter-Terrorism, Counter-Proliferation Intervention, 15 Florida J. Int™l
Law (Fall 2002).
Practice Randomly Selected Transparency Visit to a Biodefense Facility, BWC/AD
HOC GROUP/WP.437 (December 13, 2000).
343
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Rennack, Dianne E., Nuclear, Biological, Chemical, and Missile Proliferation
Sanctions: Selected Current Law, Library of Congress. Congressional Research
Service (1998).
Rissanen, Jenni, Continued Turbulence Over BWC Verification, Veri¬cation Year-
book 2002 (December 2002).
Roberts, Guy, Arms Control Without Arms Control: The Failure of the Biological
Weapons Convention Protocol and a New Paradigm for Fighting the Threat of
Biological Weapons, INSS Occasional Paper #49, Institute for National Secu-
rity Studies (March 2003).
Robinson, Clarence A. Jr., Missile Technology Access Emboldens Rogue Nations, Sig-
nal (April 1999).
Rosenberg, Barbara Hatch, Defending Against Biodefense: The Need for Limits, Dis-
armament Diplomacy, No. 69 (February/March 2003).
Russell, Ron, A Question of Risk: Plans for a Biodefense “Hot Lab” at Lawrence Liv-
ermore Have Ecologists, Disarmament Advocates, and Mainstream Scientists Up
in Arms, SF Weekly (January 28, 2004).
Secret Biodefense Activities Are Undermining the Norm Against Biological Weapons,
Working Group on Biological Weapons, Position Paper, Federation of American
Scientists (January 2003).
Seven Good Reasons to Stand Up for Information Freedom on Bioweapons Research:
And What Agendas May Be at Work to Squelch the Public™s Right to Know, The
Sunshine Project, News Release (October 30, 2001).
Shea, Dana, The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center: Issues
for Congress, CRS Report for Congress (April 25, 2005).
Sidawi, Danielle, & Skip Derraf, Proteomics™ Growing Role in Biodefense, R and D
(July 1, 2005).
Sims, Nicholas A., The Evolution of Biological Disarmament, Stockholm Interna-
tional Peace Research Institute (2001).
Sims, Nicholas A., The New Multilateral Approach for the BTWC: Ambiguities and
Opportunities, Briefing Paper No. 2 (Second Series), University of Bradford (UK)
Department of Peace Studies (January 2003).
Siniscalchi, Joseph, Non-Lethal Technologies: Implications for Military Strategy,
Occasional Paper No. 3, Center for Strategy and Technology (March 1998).
Smith, Bradley T.; Thomas V. Inglesby, & Tara O™Toole, Biodefense R & D: Antici-
pating Future Threats, Establishing a Strategic Environment, Biosecurity and
Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2003).
State Department, New Law to Provide Medical Countermeasures Against WMD
Attack; Bush Signed Bill to Improve Homeland Security, Federal Information and
News Dispatch (July 22, 2004).
Statement by the International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva. First Special
Session of the Conference of the States Parties to Review the Operation of the
Chemical Weapons Convention. First Review Conference, The Hague (April 28“
May 9, 2003).
Stern, Jessica, Dreaded Risks and the Control of Biological Weapons, International
Security (Winter 2002/2003).
344 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Stockman, Farah, Weapons ˜Inspectors,™ Canadian Activists Plan to Spotlight
U.S. Research on Germ, Chemical Warfare, Boston Globe (December 30,
2002).
Sutton, Victoria, Biodefense: Who™s In Charge?, Health Matrix, Vol. 13, No. 117
(2003).
Technical Justification for Limited Size of the Area of Investigation, BWC/AD HOC
GROUP/WP.434 (November 28, 2000).
The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpil-
ing of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction,
26 U.S.T. 583; T.I.A.S. 8062; 1015 U.N.T.S. 163 (Signed April 10, 1972; entered into
force March 26, 1976).
Thompson, Craig, Missing Links . . . Genetically Altered Biological Weaponry: A Gift
from the Biopreparat to the World Part One, Journal of Counterterrorism &
Homeland Security International (Spring 2003).
Thr¨ nert, Oliver, The Compliance Protocol and the Three Depository Powers, in Bio-
a
logical Warfare and Disarmament: New Problems/New Perspectives, Susan
Wright (ed.), Rowman & Little¬eld Publishers, (2002).
Toje, Asle, Time to Change the Rules? The EU Response to WMD and Weapons
of Minimal Destruction proliferation, EU Policy Network available at
http://www.europeananalysis.com/research/toje1.pdf
Toner, Mike, World Argues Biological Arms Ban, Atlanta Journal-Constitution
(November 10, 2002).
Tornudd, Klaus, Disarmament Processes for a World at Peace in Twenty Years, Dis-
armament(1997).
Trial Inspection of a Biological Production Facility, Working Paper Submitted by
Australia, The Ad Hoc Group of the States Parties to the Convention on the
Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriologi-
cal and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, BWC/AD HOC GROUP/WP.77
(July 18, 1996).
Tucker, Jonathan B, A Farewell to Germs; The U.S. Renunciation of Biological and
Toxin Warfare, 1969“70, International Security (Summer 2002).
Tucker, Jonathan B., Strengthening the BWC: A Way Forward, Disarmament Diplo-
macy, Issue No. 78 (July/August 2004).
U.S. Special Forces Seek Genetically Engineered Bioweapons, The Sunshine Project,
News Release (August 12, 2002).
Weapons of Mass Destruction: Additional Russian Cooperation Needed to Facilitate
U.S. Efforts to Improve Security at Russian Sites, GAO Report GAO-03-482 (March
24, 2003).
Wheelis, Mark, & Malcolm Dando, Back to Bioweapons?, Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists, Vol. 59, No. 1 (January/February 2003).
Wheelis, Mark, “Nonlethal” Chemical Weapons: A Faustian Bargain, Issues in Sci-
ence and Technology (Spring 2003).
Wheelis, Mark, Biotechnology and Biochemical Weapons, Nonproliferation
Review, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Spring 2002).
345
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Wheelis, Mark, Investigating Disease Outbreaks under a Protocol to the Biological
and Toxin Weapons Convention, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 6, No. 6
(November“December 2000).
Winner, Andrew C., The Proliferation Security Initiative: The New Face of Interdic-
tion, Washington Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Spring 2005).
Working Paper submitted by China, Cuba, India, Indonesia, the Islamic Republic
of Iran, Mexico, and Pakistan, The Ad Hoc Group of the States Parties to the
Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling
of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, BWC/AD HOC
GROUP/WP.432 (November 23, 2000).
Working Paper submitted by the Group of NAM and Other Countries, Establish-
ment of a Cooperation Committee, The Ad Hoc Group of the States Parties to the
Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling
of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, BWC/AD HOC
GROUP/WP.349 (January 1999).
Working Paper submitted by the Netherlands and New Zealand BWC Article
X/Protocol Article VII, The Ad Hoc Group of the States Parties to the Convention
on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteri-
ological and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction (April 1999).
Wright, Susan, (ed.), Biological Warfare and Disarmament: New Problems/New
Perspectives, Rowman & Little¬eld Publishers (2002).
Wright, Susan, Taking Biodefense Too Far: The United States is Developing a Costly
Bioumbrella to Protect Its Citizens Against Biothreats that Do Not Now “ and May
Never “ Exist, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 60, No. 6 (November 1,
2004).


Chapter 9
A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility, Report of the High-level Panel
on Threats, Challenges, and Change, United Nations General Assembly, 59th
Session, UN Doc. A/59/565 (December 2, 2004)
Adams, William. M., et al., Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty,
Science (November 12, 2004).
Aginam, Obijiofor, Global Health Governance: International Law and Public
Health in a Divided World, University of Toronto Press (2005).
Alexander, David, Globalization of Disaster: Trends, Problems and Dilemmas, Jour-
nal of International Affairs, Vol. 59, No. 2 (March 22, 2006).
Alvarez, Jose E., The Quest for Legitimacy, 24 N.Y.U. J. Int™l L. & Pol. 199 (1991).
American Interests and UN Reform, Report on the Task Force on the United Nations,
United States Institute of Peace ( June 15, 2005).
Annex on the Protection of Confidential Information to the Chemical Weapons Con-
vention, Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (2005).
Arzberger, Peter, et al., An International Framework to Promote Access to Data;
Science and Government, Science (March 19, 2004).
346 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Badar, Mohamed Elewa, From the Nuremberg Charter to the Rome Statute: Defining
the Elements of Crimes Against Humanity, 5 San Diego Int™l L.J. 73 (2004).
Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby, Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable
Development and the Reinvention of Nature, Organization Studies (Janu-
ary 1, 2003).
Barnett, Michael N., & Martha Finnermore, The Politics, Power, and Patholo-
gies of International Organizations, International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 4
(Autumn 1999).
Batson, Amie, & Matthias M. Bekier, Vaccines Where They™re Needed; Financing
Research, McKinsey Quarterly (September 22, 2001).
Bausch, Daniel, The Ebola-virus: . . .and the Challenges to Health Research in Africa,

<<

. 58
( 61 .)



>>