. 40
( 44 .)


MC : T[ρ] MC — T[ρ] MC ’ R, because

T[ρ] MC = Ker(H 1 (π1 (S), g) ’ H 1 (“, g)) =

Im(H 1 (Cone• ) ’ H 1 (π1 (S), g))

and we have a natural pairing
H 1 (Cone• ) — H 1 (Cone• ) ’’ H 2 (Cone• ) ’ R.
g g R

The fact that this pairing is non-degenerate is explained in [20]. We
denote this 2-form on the manifold MC by ω. Since Mumford™s theorem

gives a projective structure to the manifold M (r, d) MC (we continue
to assume that r and d are coprime), there is a real number c such
that the cohomology class c[ω] is integer, i.e. in the image of the map
H 2 (MC , Z) ’ H 2 (MC , R). (It actually turns out that c can be taken
equal to r(4π 2 )’1 .)
We have already mentioned that there exists a holomorphic bundle
U over M (r, d) — X such that U|V —X V for all V . Such a bundle U is
called the universal bundle. This bundle is possible to construct using
the identi¬cation between M (r, d) and MC as follows. We construct
the holomorphic bundle U on the manifold MC — X which is actually
the family of holomorphic bundles over X parametrized by the points
of MC such that for each m ∈ MC the bundle (Um )|S is the ¬‚at bundle
over S arising from a representation ρm of π1 (S) corresponding to the
point m.
Let S be the universal cover of S and let us consider the following
bundle over MC — S:
E = Cr — S — HomC (π1 (S), G)/(π1 (S) — G),
where the group π1 (S) — G acts on Cr — S — HomC (π1 (S), G) as follows:
(a, g)(x, s, ρ) = (gρ(a)g ’1 (x), a(˜), gρg ’1 ),
˜ s
g ∈ G, a ∈ π1 (S), s ∈ S, x ∈ Cr , ρ ∈ Hom(π1 (S), G).
Now we claim that there exists a holomorphic vector bundle U over
MC —X extending the universal bundle E over MC —S with the above
properties. (For a proof of this fact we refer to [11].) Moreover, for
each m ∈ MC the bundle U|m—X is the so-called holomorphic Deligne
extension of the ¬‚at bundle E|m—S (see [18] for more details).
Since the class c[ω] is an integral cohomology class, there exists a line
bundle L on M (r, d) whose curvature is equal to cω. Let us consider an
embedding X ’ CPN coming from the Mumford™s theorem. The dual
to the tautological line bundle L on the projective space CPN restricts
to M (r, d) and L can be taken as this restriction:
L = L|M (r,d) .
Let us give another algebraic geometric construction of the line bundle
L. Let us consider an arbitrary line bundle E on X of degree g ’ 1.

We consider the subset of M (r, d) consisting of the holomorphic vector
bundles V of rank r and degree d on X such that the bundle V — E has
at least one non-zero holomorphic section. The set of such points forms
a divisor on M (r, d) - called the generalized theta divisor. There is a
well-de¬ned line bundle L corresponding to this divisor. The sections
of L are called the generalized theta functions. It turns out that the line
bundle L does not depend upon a choice of E (up to isomorphism).
Next we shall state the Verlinde formula counting the dimension
of the space of holomorphic sections of the tensor powers of the line
bundle L. Nowadays there exist much more general formulae and each
of them has many di¬erent (at a ¬rst glance) proofs. Nevertheless, we
shall give the formula in the simplest case of rank r = 2 and degree
d = 1. The line bundle L (and its tensor powers) are of outermost
importance because of the following fact: the Picard group of M (r, d)
is isomorphic to Z and is generated by L. For the proof we refer to the
works by Beauville [6] and Drezet-Narasimhan [24].

k + 1 g’1
0 —k
(’1)j (
dim H (M (2, 1), L ) = ’ jπ ) .
sin2 2k+2

5.9 Non-abelian Hodge theory
Let us brie¬‚y review the abelian (standard) Hodge theory from a slightly
di¬erent angle of view. Let (X, ω) be a compact K¨hler manifold
and let H (X, R) be its m-th cohomology group with real coe¬cients.
The main theorem in abelian Hodge theory is that the vector space
H m (X, R) carries a Hodge structure of weight m. We recall
DEFINITION 5.9.1 A Hodge structure of weight m on a vector
space V is a decreasing ¬ltration
· · · ‚ F p+1 (VC ) ‚ F p (VC ) ‚ F p’1 (VC ) ‚ · · · ,
where VC = V —R C is the complexi¬cation of V . This ¬ltration must be
such that
V p,q , V p,q := F p (VC ) © F q (VC ),
VC =

where F • is the complex conjugate ¬ltration.

Indeed, H m (X, R) —R C = H m (X, C) and if we, as usual, identify
H m (X, C) with the space of complex-valued harmonic m-forms on X,
then its subspace F p (H m (X, C)) consists of harmonic m-forms which
have at least p degrees of holomorphy. The consequence of this de¬ni-
tion is that the space
F p (H m (X, C)) © F q (H m (X, C))

consists exactly of harmonic forms of type (p, q) provided p + q = m.
The Hodge structure of weight m that we de¬ned is sometimes called a
pure Hodge structure of weight m as opposed to the more subtle notion
of a mixed Hodge structure. We refer the reader to [12] for review of
basic points of the Hodge-Deligne theory which deals with di¬erent
kinds of Hodge structures.
Let us consider the group S(C) := C— — C— , where C— = C \ {0}. The
action of complex conjugation on S(C) is de¬ned by (z, w) := (w, z ).
The set of ¬xed points of this conjugation is the real algebraic group
C— and consists of elements of the form {(z, z )}. It was Deligne
S ¯
who ¬rst made the fundamental observation that to de¬ne a Hodge
structure on a real vector space V is the same as to de¬ne a morphism
of algebraic groups over R S ’ GL(V ). Indeed, if V carries a Hodge
structure of weight m then there is an induced action of S(C) = C— — C—
on VC = V — C given by
(z1 , z2 )v = z1 z2 v, when v ∈ V p,q .

The invariants of the action of S on V — C are exactly the real points.
Originally, the notion of a variation of Hodge structure was de-
¬ned by Gri¬ths [30], the present de¬nition due to Deligne [19] is both
weaker and just right for our purposes. A complex variation of Hodge
structure on a K¨hler manifold X is a smooth C ∞ ¬‚at complex vector
bundle (V, ) satisfying the following set of conditions:
1. V comes with the decomposition V = •p+q=m V p,q into subbundles.
2. satis¬es the Gri¬ths transversality:

=d +d +¦ +¦ : (5.9.8)

V p,q ’ A1,0 (V p,q ) • A0,1 (V p,q ) • A1,0 (V p’1,q+1 ) • A0,1 (V p+1,q’1 ),
where for example A0,1 (V p,q ) is the space of di¬erential forms of type
(0, 1) with values in V p,q .
F r = •p≥r V p,q , F s = •q≥s V p,q (5.9.9)
are holomorphic and anti-holomorphic subbundles of V respectively
with respect to the holomorphic structure given by d and anti-holomorphic
stucture given by d .
4. A complex variation of Hodge structure is called polarized if, in
addition, there exists a hermitian form , (polarization) on V preserved
by such that
√ q’p
w, v , v ∈ V p,q
(w, v) = ’1

is a ¬‚at bilinear form on V , and such that V p,q ⊥ V s,t for (p, q) = (s, t)
and (’1)p v, v > 0 if v = 0.
We also should say that a real variation of Hodge structure VR is a
complex variation of Hodge structure V = VR —R C such that V p,q = V q,p .
Our ¬rst observation is that we saw in section 8 of part II that
the family f : X ’ Y , where f is a proper submersive holomorphic
map with K¨hler ¬bers gives rise to a polarized variation of Hodge
structure on Y . The polarization in this case is given by the standard
hermitian pairing on the primitive part of the cohomology Hprim (Xy , C):
if [±], [β] ∈ Hprim (Xy , C) and Xy is a K¨hler manifold with a K¨hler
a a
form ω, then we let
√ k(k’1)
±§β§ω dimC Xy ’k .
[±], [β] = ’1

In this case we say that the variation of Hodge structure arises from a
geometric situation.
Now we shall move to non-abelian Hodge theory. Let X be, as
before, a compact K¨hler manifold with a K¨hler form ω. Instead of
a a
dealing with usual cohomology groups of X with coe¬cients in R or
C we de¬ne (only) the ¬rst cohomology of X with coe¬cients in some
(non-abelian) compact real Lie group G or its ”complexi¬cation” GC
(i.e. GC is a reductive algebraic group and G is its maximal compact

subgroup). To make things easier to understand and appreciate, here
and further we shall assume that GC = GL(r, C) and G = U (r). Now
we de¬ne
H 1 (X, GC ) := Hom(π1 (X), GC )/GC ,
and H 1 (X, G) := Hom(π1 (X), G)/G;
(the latter space we already saw in section 2 - it is the moduli space
of unitary representations of the fundamental group of X). Unlike
the case when the group G is abelian, for r > 1 the sets H 1 (X, GC )
and H 1 (X, G) do not have group structures. Although, by the Mum-
ford™s theorem, the latter set has the structure of projective variety and
using an embedding GL(r, C) ’ Cr (given e.g. by a matrix represen-
tation of GL(r, C)) one can see that the former space can be viewed
as an a¬ne variety. Let π1 (X) be presented as a group in generators
x1 , ..., xl subject to p relations ri (x1 , ..., xl ) = 1, 1 ¤ i ¤ p, where ri is
a non-commutative word in (x1 , ..., xl ). First, we can view the space
Hom(π1 (X), GC ) as a subset of
2 2
Y = GL(r, C) — · · · — GL(r, C) ‚ Cr — · · · — Cr

given by the solutions of the equations

ri (X1 , ..., Xl ) = 1, 1 ¤ i ¤ p,

where Xj is the coordinate on the j-th multiple of Y . The space

Hom(π1 (X), GC )

clearly carries the structure of an a¬ne variety as it is given by the set of
zeros of a ¬nite number of polynomials. The group GC acts algebraically
on Y by conjugating each multiple and this action in turn induces an
action of GC on Hom(π1 (X), GC ). Let O(Hom(π1 (X), GC )) be the ring
of algebraic functions on the a¬ne algebraic variety Hom(π1 (X), GC ).
The group GC has an obvious induced action on this ring. Now one can
think of the structure ring O(H 1 (X, GC )) to be equal to the subring
OG (Hom(π1 (X), GC ))

of GC -invariants of the ring O(Hom(π1 (X), GC )). In general, the vari-
eties H 1 (X, G) and H 1 (X, GC ) are not smooth, and the study of their
singularities is an important aspect of the Non-abelian Hodge theory.
We already know that a representation ρ of the fundamental group
π1 (X):
ρ : π1 (X) ’ GL(V ),
where V is a vector space, is the same as a vector bundle V over X
equipped with a ¬‚at connection ρ with the ¬ber over x0 (the base
point of π1 (X)) equal to V . The notion of ¬‚at bundle is closely related
to the notion of Higgs bundle introduced by Hitchin [33] for Riemann
surfaces and by Simpson [51] in general:

DEFINITION 5.9.2 A Higgs bundle (W, ¦ ) over X is a holomorphic
vector bundle W over X equipped with a holomorphic map ¦ : W ’
W — „¦1 (X) such that ¦ is a Higgs ¬eld, i.e. ¦ §¦ = 0 in End(W ) —
„¦2 (X).

Another way of saying it, a Higgs ¬eld ¦ can be considered as a
form of type (1, 0) with coe¬cients in the (complex) Lie algebra bun-
dle End(W ) satisfying some additional properties. More precisely, let
z1 , ..., zn be local holomorphic coordinates on X, if one writes ¦ =
i ¦i dzi , then ¦i are holomorphic endomorphisms of W and the condi-
tion ¦ §¦ = 0 tells us that the matrices ¦i commute with one another.
Let us think about the holomorphic bundle W as just a complex
vector bundle together with an operator d : W ’ W — „¦1 (X). This
operator d de¬nes the holomorphic structure on W : the holomorphic
sections of W are exactly those annihilated by d . If we now look at
the operator
D := ¦ + d : W ’ W — A1 (X),
then it is easy to see that the conditions
d = 0, d (¦ ) = 0, and ¦ §¦ = 0


. 40
( 44 .)